Court Releases Written Judgment In Case Of Dreadlocked Girl Barred From School

August 9, 2020

The Gleaner, August 3, 2020

Photo: Sherine and Dale Virgo, the parents of the seven-year-old Kensington Primary School student outside the Supreme Court on Friday – Gladstone Taylor

The Supreme Court has now published its written judgment in the case of the Kensington Primary School student who was denied access because of her dreadlocked hair. 

According to the court, the girl’s constitutional rights, as pleaded, were not breached.

READ: Full Judgment here

The three-member panel held that the policy of the school did not breach the child’s right to education.

The judges also found that the child does not have a right to attend a particular institution and as such Kensington Primary School can reject her as a student.

The panel further said this does not affect the child’s right to education as she could always attend another school that supports her form of expression.

Since the judgment was handed down on Friday, there has been intense debate and criticism about the ruling.

Recent posts
SLAVE CODES: SLAVERY LEGISLATION IN THE SWEDISH AND DANISH EMPIRES
The African slaves were considered as treacherous and evil, not deserving to be considered human.
SLAVE CODES: SLAVERY LEGISLATION IN ENGLISH AND FRENCH EMPIRES
What emerged from the articles of the Barbadian Code was, in conclusion, a system of regulation of slavery designed to control the entire workforce, built on the conviction that primitives and barbarian Africans were naturally destined to be slaves because of their inferiority from a cultural and racial point of view.